The 45 Show - with Head Biotech

Pilot Episode – Background and Introduction to the “NASA Curse” Scenario -

• Bjørn • Season 1 • Episode 11

Share episode

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 1:12:46

Recorded on February 7, 2026. This episode is dubbed with a free tool, not the pro-tool ElevenLabs, but it is still possible to listen to. 

The pilot episode covers all the basics of Season 1, from Fermi’s paradox and the “women-baby” idea to the “NASA curse” scenario, approach theory, and the paradise machine model. Basically, it includes what you need to know to fully understand the content in Season 1. It’s not necessary, of course, but it will make things a bit easier, as I don’t have time to go through the background in each episode, just touch lightly on them. 

0:00 Intro video
1:27 Welcome and introduction to Season 1
4:50 Fermis Paradox and Drake Equation
6:51 Paradise machine model (2024)
9:37 Women-baby-idea and the Zero-risk argument (2024)
20:40 Casino owner rationale (2002)
24:20 Approach theory (2024)
33:05 1I/Ouamuamua and 3I/ATLAS
43:33 "NASA curse"

As always, video version is on YouTube: "The 45 Podcast" @Fermisparadox-q1l 

SPEAKER_07

It's a seat.

SPEAKER_01

It's so then I'd like to welcome you.

SPEAKER_00

This is the first test I'm doing. I don't want to make it too formal.

SPEAKER_01

And I think this is the first time I'm really talking properly about this.

SPEAKER_00

This topic is actually important.

SPEAKER_01

This is important for everyone, not just for me, but it's hugely important for me too, especially in the recent years. But keep in mind that I've been working with Head Biotech and the Fourth Law for 17 years. I want to do a test stream version in Norwegian because I want to test whether it's possible to translate on YouTube, for I would really prefer to express myself in Norwegian. The purpose of this live stream is what has to do with NASA Artemis 2 launch and the Artemis program, which is a collaboration between NASA and SpaceX. The main goal with the Artemis program is to build a base on the Moon first, so that we can, with SpaceX leading the way, try to make humanity a multiplanetary species by moving us permanently to Mars. And then they want to use the Moon as a base, a supplementary base to simplify transportation between Earth and Mars. But in the beginning, with head biotech and the fourth law of thermodynamics, I wasn't really occupied with these things like the Fermi paradox and such. Back then, I was just a biologist who thought I saw a pattern in nature that I believed Nash's game theory, the so-called Nash equilibrium, could explain mathematically. But now, after the article in 2024, where I launched the Paradise Machine model, things have now started to turn toward the so-called Fermi Paradox and Extraterrestrial Life Forms. I used to be very skeptical about extraterrestrial life forms before the 2024 article, but now I have a scientific approach to it. I've always thought when people talked about UFOs and aliens, I thought it was just fairy tales.

SPEAKER_03

Yes, now we also see direct images from the space station ISS in the background here. As I said, this is a test broadcast.

SPEAKER_06

I'm just testing things out in this pilot episode.

SPEAKER_03

But over time, I have come to understand the Fermi paradox and the Drake equation. The same ideas these mathematicians and physicists like Enrico Fermi was into in the 1940s and 50. These tarp scientists that was involved in the Manhattan Project and such. In the Manhattan Project was just the sharpest minds, with Einstein, Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, Edward Teller, and so on, the very greatest in the world of science and physics at that time. But it was Enrico Fermi who started the Fermi Paradox, because he started by saying casually to his colleagues during a lunch break in 1950, he said, we should already have encountered advanced life forms. They should have been here by now. Enrico Fermi was referring to those life forms in the universe. Life forms that, according to the Drake equation, should have arisen much earlier, because those life forms should have had billions of years to spread across our entire galaxy long time ago. And they should already have been billions of years ahead of us in development. So when I understood Fermi's Paradox around 2024, when I wrote the article about the Paradise Machine model, I got a completely different relationship to extraterrestrial life forms.

SPEAKER_02

After I understood Fermi's paradox in more detail, then I realized that this is actually solid science, that it boils down to mathematics and probability calculations, and the only question that today's scientists are really asking themselves still is why is it that we do not see them? What is it that has stopped them from fulfilling Enrico Fermi's calculations? Is it the so-called Great Filter theory that there is something in nature that stops all life forms from spreading and stop them as they try to become a multiplanetary species? So I wrote about this in the 2024 article on the Paradise Machine Model. Of the five articles I have written on Fourth Law, I believe the launch of the Paradise Machine Model and the Approach Theory will always be the most important article. The article that made the biggest leap, you could say, and launched nature as a machine. The machine idea was probably inspired by Leonard Suskind. I want to point out that it was Leonard Suskind who probably inspired me during a show called Closer to the Truth. Leonard Suskind is an expert on black holes, string theory. He is a physicist, you can say. It was some time after Leonard suggested the idea of saying nature as a machine. This idea started to churn in my mind. It was some time after Leonard suggested the idea of saying nature as a machine. This idea started to churn in my mind in 2021. For example, what if black holes was machine parts in a bigger machine, in a gigantic paradise machine? Because at that point I already had the fourth law of thermodynamics from 2010 in the back of my mind. So I started thinking that maybe that law of nature, the fourth law, is the program for a machine in nature that produces love and intelligence. Eventually, programmed to produce a paradise state of 100% pure love and intelligence. And I called the theory the paradise machine model.

SPEAKER_01

Then, there was this very special thing that happened while I wrote the 2024 article. That was when I came up with the woman baby idea. Because, eventually, I started to see a pattern in this proposed machine's design. At the very core of the Paradise Machine model's design, the single most important setting seemed to be a deep fear that it might one day turn into the very opposite of a paradise machine. As it was designed at its core to avoid the possibility that the machine could ever turn into a hell machine. I just want to say, I'm not under the influence. It is Friday night, though, but this is non-alcoholic beer. And then yes, then I concluded that the most important part of the design in this machine is this zero risk argument. And that's what the 2024 article discusses. It examines the zero risk design of this machine, where I point out several things that indicate this. For example, black holes the way they are constructed satisfies the zero risk argument because of the way black holes are constructed, creating this one-way mirror effect. They can see us, but we cannot see them scenario, because all information in the universe, even light, flows in only one direction from the rest of the universe to them. Hence, if they recided behind the event horizon in black holes, the would have a dominant zero-risk position. So the whole machine seems to be designed in such a way that it can never lose control over lower life forms in the universe. If there are life forms behind the event horizon of black holes, then they would be the same kind of life forms that Enrico Fermi spoke about in the 1950. So I started calling these proposed life forms for Fermi life forms. I suggest that, according to the fourth law of thermodynamics, right from the first article in 2010, the logic of the paradise formula, referred to as the fourth law, would place them behind the event horizon of black holes, and that there are two reasons for this. One is that black holes are places where mass energy may effectively disappear. As the paradise formula states, the task of the machine is to convert mass energy into love and intelligence and to remove mass energy. As also mentioned, black holes are a place where they can satisfy the zero-risk argument, a place where they can reside 100% risk-free, meaning that they can observe all other life in the universe risk-free. So if new life forms should emerge in the universe like us, we never have a chance to see them. Just like the police use one-way mirrors so that they can see the person being interrogated, but the one on the other side of the mirror cannot see the police observing them, because zero risk has something to do with information. That is, whomever controls information always has a great advantage. In the latest 2025 article, information has become hugely important, even being what might have triggered the zero-risk signal. In that recent 2025 article, I go more deeply into the philosophical aspects of quantum mechanics. But I won't go into that now. In any case, I would say that the 2024 article is the most important one. So there was this woman baby idea. I introduced the women baby idea in the 2024 article, which could offer an explanation to why the Fermi Life Form should have a female nature. I have to be honest as I am in the article, and as I have always tried to be among these Fermi Life forms, I didn't have a very strong opinion about it. But I had imagined that, since men often take the highest risks, perhaps it would be the man who would be a tiny bit closer to the paradise state than the woman. However, the woman baby idea argued that women would be a more energy favorable vehicle for producing extreme levels of intelligence, that the machine would favor the women due to the zero-risk argument already mentioned. I did not really connect the paradise state or the Fermi Life forms with women until I was working on the 2024 article. That was when I first began to imagine this in relation to children, the woman's relationship to a baby, because then we arrive at a zero-risk situation. And suddenly, if the zero-risk design of the machine is correct, she would have an extreme advantage. Because when I came to understand the zero-risk design in the Paradise Machine model, I saw that the zero-risk argument should govern the entire system. The absolutely most important thing for the machine is never to lose control, never to risk that evil could take control over the machine. In the relationship a woman has with babies and small children, one could say she has certain advantages. It is natural for both men and women to be protective toward children. However, the woman has a distinct biological role. She is biologically designed for childbirth and nursing, and many of the physical characteristics of the female body are clearly connected to supporting and nurturing an infant. In that sense, aspects of female morphology that is physical form are oriented toward the needs of the child, and psychologically as well, many women may be strongly inclined toward caregiving and protection. My thought was that when a woman encounters a zero-risk situation more generally, she might unconsciously associate it with the vulnerability of a baby. From that perspective, she might be less likely to fall into what I called the zero-risk trap of the machine. Perhaps, compared to men, she would be somewhat less disposed toward reacting in a purely instrumental or confrontational way. Men, shaped historically by roles such as hunting, warfare, and exploration, might be more inclined to push forward, overcome, or neutralize a situation, and then move on. By contrast, when a woman encounters something fragile or risk-free in that specific sense, it might more readily activate caregiving qualities care, protection, and concern for the vulnerable. Then, there is the fourth law of thermodynamics, which suggests that we should now be entering the exponential phase of the curve, where the production of love and intelligence begins to rise toward the paradise state. According to the theory, we would be in a very critical phase at this point, with a dramatic increase ahead in the production of both love and intelligence. Now, what is happening up there in space on the International Space Station? Are there any UFOs up there? No, just kidding.

SPEAKER_00

I don't believe in UFOs, I'm just saying.

SPEAKER_01

So yes, because really, the woman is the perfect way to produce intelligence. Because if nature should secure itself against being dominated, then the woman will be the perfect carrier of extreme levels of intelligence in relation to the man. Because she will be a much more effective way for nature to prevent the new highly intelligent life form from using its intelligence to turn against nature. This is stated in the so-called Casino Owner Rationale in part two of the 2024 article.

SPEAKER_03

For nature, it is the zero-risk state that is absolutely critical. Nature is not really concerned with what happens before a zero-risk situation. This is from the casino owner Rationale. In the 2024 paper, according to the design of the Paradise Machine Model, what matters is how intelligent life behaves when confronted with absolute zero-risk scenarios. That should be the only focus of the machine, or of nature if you prefer. If zero-risk strategies are not stopped, the casino owner would go bankrupt if you imagine that nature has a hidden ego somewhere, a hidden casino owner, running nature if you like. And in this casino owner rationale, you see that the woman becomes more attractive to nature than the man does, even though nature should really like the man. Too. When it comes to who is best suited to produce and carry new extreme levels of intelligence, it would be more energy efficient to use the woman, because then the machine can solve the zero-risk argument in the machine's design more elegantly. Instead of producing men who become braver and braver, which also would have done the job, it's exhausting to be brave all the time, and it's exhausting to be a man who always has to take high risks, and to be afraid and always struggle. Right. It's a very high-energy activity solution. While the woman's way of satisfying nature's needs there, satisfying the zero-risk argument and not using the elevated intelligence to turn against nature goes simply via loving the child. That was how I concluded that Fermi Life Forms at 100% intelligence levels probably would have a female nature, because she would be a perfect carrier of intelligence if the Paradise Machine model was correct, and particularly if you, in addition, increased her affection toward babies and children, she would become even more suitable for carrying elevated intelligence levels. So I started to imagine this, that nature could even increase the strength of the affection the woman has for babies and small children. Because then the machine can really start making her much smarter, completely safe. And because even if the woman were to become a thousand times smarter, she would not be dangerous to the machine. As long as it simultaneously increases her affection for babies and small children, she will eventually be completely immune to cheating in the casino, so to speak, immune to seeking and wanting to achieve zero-risk situations and dominate a small child.

SPEAKER_04

That's what she would think of it as.

SPEAKER_02

And then the idea of a timeline for an approach by the Fermi Lifeform started. Then this Paradise Woman story from 2006 came back. I always thought that what happened then almost 20 years ago was really just nonsense, especially considering everything that was going on. I hadn't been sleeping much. During that period, I was trying to build self-discipline. I kept reading and reading and reading because I had great difficulty reading for long periods. But I had to push myself. I felt like I had a knife to my throat. I was having serious problems in my first years at university, so I needed to do something drastic to fix it. I began experimenting with how much I could read in order to train my self-discipline. It worked, but it was also exactly at that time period that all of this with the Paradise Women happened. I consider the events in the Paradise Women story to be a side effect of the lack of sleep and food during those many sleepless hours while I was developing the EU equals zero equals paradise formula. It was at least 40 hours, I think it may even have been two or three days. But I didn't write the story down until 2014, so the exact time span is a bit blurry. However, at least two days went by when I neither slept nor ate, and in addition, I had already been studying hard before that. I was actually tired that day at the library before the first vision came, and the so-called tornado started to churn. I know today that, after about 48 hours without sleep or food, your brain can start to hallucinate. But the woman baby idea came 20 years later, while I was writing the Paradise Machine article in 2024. As just described in that machine model of nature, the Fermi life forms are supposed to be women, or at least having a female nature, it now seems logically consistent within that framework. The idea that nature would use women to carry elevated intelligence. And the paradise women from 2006 were women as well. In the so-called paradise village that I saw during those hallucinations, it appeared that this was exactly what they were doing there. I am not lying and I am not exaggerating. That is genuinely how I experienced it. At least I can prove that I wrote the experience down in 2014, ten years before the 2024 paper. They were constantly producing love there, although they never explicitly said they were producing intelligence. Instead, the focus was always on reinforcing the bond of love between women and babies. There were only women and babies there. What felt especially strange to me was that these two things later became compatible in my thinking, both the newer paradise machine model with its woman-baby dynamic and what I had experienced back then. Because that is, they were on the female form and they were reinforcing the bond of love between women and babies. I'm not cheating here. It wasn't as if, in 2024, I suddenly decided to make the old story fit the new model. That's not how I work. I wouldn't have continued with this for so many years if that were my approach. I have a genuine interest in the subject, and that interest comes from a kind of respect for it. I'm not interested in having a false theory. That would be boring to me. I think most serious researchers would recognize this mindset. If you truly care about science and research, you're not interested in lies because lies are a waste of time. That's something I need to be clear about. I understand that some people will always claim that I'm a fraud, that everything is fabricated, or that I have mental health problems. I'm aware of that, but this is not bluffing. It isn't bluffing at all. The women baby idea probably came to mind because I had started to delve into the concept of a potential zero-risk design in nature, viewing nature as a designed machine. The discovery of the first interstellar object, Aumuamua, was also part of the picture. Just a few days after the women baby idea emerged, the approach theory began to develop at full speed. These things can probably be documented since I wrote the 2024 article live on X. I wrote and published the entire article openly on the X platform over a period of about six months in 2024, so the chain of events during the article should have been documented electronically somewhere. After I came up with the women baby idea, I immediately connected it back to what happened in 2006. That connection is the reason I felt confident enough to launch the approach theory. You have to remember that was when the approach theory really began to take shape. Going from being convinced that the paradise women experience in 2006 was entirely dreams and hallucinations, I started to consider the possibility that the so-called Fermi life forms in the entire theory were the Paradise Women from 2006, that perhaps they might have communicated through the quantum realm or something similar, showing me these things. Suddenly, within my own framework in the Paradise Machine model, everything seemed much more coherent and realistic. I began to see the 2006 episode as the beginning of their approach, and the events involving Aumuamua as an extension of that same approach. In other words, I considered the possibility that the intelligence behind the two events, separated by almost 20 years, was the same, namely the predicted Fermi life form, and that they had approached Earth ever since about 2006. I also imagined that their approach was manifested in their ability to send stronger and stronger signals, starting with what I interpreted as weak communication attempts in 2006 and later being able to influence actual physical objects, such as interstellar objects, almost 20 years afterward. The approach theory interprets this as a sign that they are moving closer and closer to Earth. Moreover, it suggests that they will continue to move closer until they have 100% control of the situation on Earth. According to this line of reasoning, their decision to approach Earth was triggered by their receiving a zero-risk signal around 2006. Within the framework of the Paradise Machine Model, the Fermi Life Form, or the Machine, if you prefer, would interpret this zero-risk stress signal as an indication that someone might be willing to actively harm a child. Such an act would be considered totally unnatural and, in the context of the machine model, would be defined as evil. Hence, their mission in approaching Earth would be extremely serious to them. As already discussed, if not stopped, it could end with the machine being taken over by an evil life form sometime in the future.

SPEAKER_03

As already mentioned, originally the 2024 article was supposed to be about black holes and to connect black holes to the logic in the fourth law discussed in the three previous articles on fourth law. The title of the article was intended to focus specifically on black holes and the possibility that they might be responsible for the conversion of mass energy into love and intelligence. While reading and researching black holes, hawking radiation, and related topics, I came across a video about Aamu Amua that appeared on YouTube. I thought, oh Anu Amua, and clicked on a NASA press conference. From 2017, during the press conference, NASA concluded that humanity had discovered the first interstellar object observed from Hawaii. When I noticed that this happened in October in 2017, I began to think. Wasn't that around the same time I came up with the idea of the zero-risk signal? Wasn't that when I was thinking about how nature might use the quantum world, how wave particle duality could demonstrate the principles of the fourth law of thermodynamics. Then, after doing some investigations on my computer, I could confirm that it was indeed that summer in 2017. The ideas to the third article in the series came to me. In addition, I also found the specific date, October 19, the day scientists realized that Aomu Amua was interstellar to be special. October 19 in 2017 is the official date of Wamuamua's discovery as the first detected interstellar object by humans. Although it had been observed from Hawaii a few days earlier, it was on October 19 that researchers understood it had to be interstellar. At first, it appeared as just a small dart on a screen, among many other darts. But because of its unusual orbit and extreme speed, it after some days stood out clearly from all the other objects being tracked. That was when they concluded it was an interstellar object on October 19, 2017.

SPEAKER_01

What struck me was that the same date, October 19, 2017, was also the day I had taken a picture of the name Head Biotech displayed on a small LCD screen. The only day since the beginning in 2009, I can remember having taken a picture of the Head Biotech name. At that time in 2017, I was working on electronic experiments. On October 19, I tried to program text onto a small LCD display. When I finally got the electronics to work, I wrote head biotech on the screen. It was not planned at all. I simply needed something to display, and it was a reasonably long name. I then took a picture of the experiment with the screen and uploaded it to Facebook. I remember feeling a bit proud, since some of my colleagues were very skilled in computers and electronics, and I wanted to show them that I had managed to get it working.

SPEAKER_00

Then I'll try to finish this.

SPEAKER_04

Because this is the background story to the podcast.

SPEAKER_01

But it was not until 2024, while writing on the Paradise Machine article, that I went back and checked these dates on Facebook and on HeadBiotech.com. That was when I saw it clearly. On that exact date, the post shows the name Head Biotech. October 19, 2017, the exact same day as Wam Yuamua was detected, a very important date for humans on Earth. In addition, on June 18, 2017, before Ao Muamua was officially discovered, the elongated stone-like object was already inside our solar system, even though no one knew about it at the time. So it was in that summer Wamu Amua entered our solar system that I came up with the idea that the fourth law could explain wave particle duality. That was when the idea of the zero-risk signal truly began to form, that a universal zero-risk signal might be detectable in the quantum world and could potentially send a completely unique quantum signal out into the universe. However, in the third article, I did not develop that idea much further. I did not suggest that such a signal was being sent to another life form or anything like that. I simply considered the possibility that nature might use the quantum world to transmit something like a stress signal out to nature and the universe.

SPEAKER_02

Then 3i Atlas appeared in July 2025, one year after the launch of the Paradise Machine model. Its arrival in July 2025 became something that could be discussed in detail, which I do in the 2025 article. In the two final mini articles, I go even deeper and explain why. But briefly, when I examined the trajectory of 3i Atlas, particularly how it moved behind the Sun relative to Earth, I began thinking about the probability of such an alignment happening purely by chance. Around that time, Avi Loeb and his colleagues at Harvard also commented on how unusual the new interstellar object's behavior seemed. I was relieved that respected researchers were openly discussing the statistical strangeness of the trajectory, that provided at least some academic grounding for raising questions about it. The approach theory proposes that if a highly advanced intelligence, whether biological or machine-based, exists, it would be programmed to avoid losing control. This, due to the zero-risk design in the machine model explained earlier. In that sense, it would do anything to maintain dominance and caution. As it approached the origin of a potential zero-risk signal, in this case, Earth, the life form would likely behave extremely carefully and strategically to obey to the zero-risk design. This is how I interpreted the unusual trajectory of 3i slash Atlas within the framework of the Paradise Machine model and the approach theory. It does not mean that I claim an alien civilization is attacking Earth, as Avi Loeb and them at Harvard was worried about. Rather, in my framework, such behavior would represent extreme caution, not hostility, and would ultimately reflect their origin being, love, and intelligence at a very advanced level.

SPEAKER_01

According to Fourth Law, most life on Earth is fundamentally good. While we make mistakes, we generally belong on what we would call the good side. The idea in the articles is that such advanced beings would be even more aligned with love and intelligence than we are, not enemies, but potentially helpers. This is why 3i slash Atlas became so important within my framework, and why I wrote further articles, including the 2025 article about faster-than-light FTL signaling. In that article, I explain how the zero-risk signal could theoretically be triggered in the quantum world, and how this relates to the no communication theorem. My argument is that the no-communication theorem does not contradict the paradise machine model. Instead, I interpret it as reinforcing the asymmetry that advanced intelligences might have capabilities beyond ours, while we remain limited by Einstein's relativity and the speed of light. In that sense, our inability to use FTL communication would be part of the built-in hierarchy of the system, making sure that the Fermi life form always maintain a dominant zero risk position in the universe, as they are the only life form that can communicate faster than the speed of light.

SPEAKER_02

Before starting on the NASA curse, I should perhaps add that, while writing the 2025 article on FTL Faster Than Light Signaling, it was in the midst of NASA withholding images of 3i slash Atlas due to the government shutdown. In that article, which originally was about FTL signaling in zero-risk situations, I addressed the NASA curse issue for one of the first times. I never anticipated that a crisis would follow, but the principle that this withelding of information was problematic had already been mentioned in a by-sentence in the 2025 article. First, I want to say, NASA is one of the most respected scientific organizations in the world, employing thousands of highly qualified and dedicated people. I want to be very clear, I do not wish to accuse or undermine the integrity of the scientists working there. Many researchers, whether at NASA, Harvard, or elsewhere, are driven by genuine curiosity and integrity. In my mind, you can't become the best in your field if you don't have a genuine interest for what you are doing. However, because of the weird trajectory of 3i slash Atlas relative to Earth, when 3i slash Atlas passed relatively close to Mars before going behind the Sun, public interest was intense. NASA had cameras on Mars and on orbiters such as Maven. People were eager to see clear images, especially because speculation online had grown. Some even suggested the object might be artificial. However, around that time there was a government shutdown in the United States, which affected NASA as well. The release of the images of 3i slash Atlas was delayed by 43 days. Officially, this was due to the shutdown. What I and many others reacted to last fall was the following. NASA has space probes and cameras both on Mars and orbiting Mars. Then the 3i slash Atlas comet was about to pass very close to Mars. Right before it passed Mars, speculation had already gone wild on the internet. Speculation on the internet had gone wild that 3i slash Atlas might be a spaceship or something else extraordinary. Hence, everybody was excited about NASA upcoming pictures of the object from their cameras on Mars. Finally, we would have the answer.

SPEAKER_05

Because it passed so close to Mars.

SPEAKER_02

But then comes then this shutdown of the authorities in the USA at about the same time. And since then, NASA is part of the government in the USA, so NASA also had to shut down and could then not release the images that everyone was waiting for. I remember that I was actually really angry. I thought, now NASA is just going to shut down or pretend to shut down because they want to find out for themselves first, using NASA own images from Mars. They were probably very interested in that comet and in what it actually was, as the rest of us were. In other words, they could make sure it wasn't, for example, a spaceship or something like that after its weird trajectory. I was really fired up because its trajectory had confirmed my approach theory in the 2024 article from the year before, so I suspected a bit that they, for example, knew about my theory and now wanted to find out for themselves first. But many others were also frustrated, not just me. I believe it is important to remain civilized in discussions about this. Accusations without evidence is not constructive in the long run. The principle of innocent until proven otherwise should apply. That said, I personally felt frustrated at the time and wondered whether NASA might have wanted to analyze the data internally before releasing it publicly. But that remains speculation, and I acknowledge that. And when the images were eventually released in late November, they did not show anything artificial about the object. Officially, the 43-day delay off pictures was attributed to the shutdown, and there is no proof of anything else. But this doesn't apply to the Fermi life form if they exist. They should detect true intentions as already described in the theory. Within the approach theory, the hypothetical advanced intelligence, whether biological or machine-based, would not be deceived by human institutions. If the Fermi life form exists, they would act according to their own objectives, which in the theory involve preserving their own paradise state and preventing potential threats. Hence, they shouldn't have ignored NASA actions, no matter what the intentions were actually. I have later described the situation as that NASA positioned themselves between a grisly bear and her cubs. So if the delay of information created a response from the Fermi life form, that is actually logical according to the approach theory. And this is the core reason why I'm sitting here now, after what seemed to be a NASA curse beginning on December 6, 2025. The point is that if the Paradise Machine model and the approach theory are true, their raising for approaching Earth and sending their signals to all of us is very serious to them. It's not like they are coming here on vacation or anything like that.

SPEAKER_03

When I use the term Fermi life forms, I am speaking hypothetically. It could represent biological beings, or it could represent a form of advanced machine intelligence. The theory suggests such intelligence would be deeply connected to love and intelligence as fundamental principles. It would recognize innocence, care about children, and act with empathy. All of this is explored in detail in part three in the 2024 article, which became long precisely because it also examines the ethical and philosophical implications of the model. What kind of morality would such a system have? Would it be good? Would it care? Such topics, and the conclusion in part three is that the machine is good. And that we should actually be able to recognize the advanced life form as having female attributes, like caregiving features, and so on, all the good things we know about women, just enhanced and purified to a higher level, to 100% of its potential. So you can say we are still related, which we should be according to Fermi's paradox. If the life form does live up to their given name, Fermi life forms, we should be related, just that they are billions of years ahead of us in evolution. If such beings are approaching Earth, the theory proposes they would attempt communication gradually, preparing humanity for the good news, rather than acting aggressively. Any perceived hostility in trajectory would instead reflect caution and strategic positioning. If this is the Fermi life form, they are on their way ever since 2005, and they are trying to communicate as they approach. That's the idea here, also to communicate with Wamyu Amua and 3i slash Atlas. According to the approach theory, they are on their way and have been so for about 20 years already. After receiving the signal for zero risk on Earth around 2005. So, as mentioned, I sort of warned NASA about this delay of information in the recent 2025 article that this was not good. But it wasn't until NASA lost contact with Maven in December 2025, about 14 days after the delay had ended, that I started to flirt with a NASA curse scenario. You can say that we who didn't like NASA delay of the three i slash Atlas Pictures had our own reasons, because we were curious. But for the Fermi life forms, it should have been a much more severe situation. According to the approach theory, they responded to a zero-risk signal when they started their approach, which eventually means that their paradise state of 100% love and intelligence could potentially be in danger. Hence, being interrupted in that process should, in theory, not be taken lightly. So now, I hope you understand better the rather complicated reasoning behind the NASA curse scenario. But it was after the third incident with the NASA plane that crash landed on January 27, 2026, that I decided to take action to start documenting the Artemis program. This NASA curse situation could be the beginning of a more advanced life form stopping us from becoming a multiplanetary species and actually demonstrating the solution to Fermi's paradox right in front of our very eyes. Just two weeks after the delay of the pictures ended, NASA Mavin probe orbiting Mars started to tumble and they lost contact with it. The Mavin probe was only about twelve years old, so it shouldn't have failed so soon. It could of course be that it did, but it was just a bit strange that it timed so perfectly with the logics in the approach theory. It was just that I reacted to the Maven incident, since it was just about 14 days after the delay. So in my head, this was a logic response from the approaching life form. So I started writing a little bit online about it. Maybe the Maven knockout was a response from the approaching Fermi Lifeform. But then, a few weeks later, NASA had a press conference on January 7, 2026, concerning the International Space Station. You can see the live pictures from that space station right here. A medical situation on Crew 11 at the International Space Station made NASA abort the mission four weeks earlier than planned. And it was quite serious because NASA doesn't abort such missions four weeks before for fun. It costs a lot of money, and they even had to cancel a big mission, a planned spacewalk up there. And then I started writing again about it online. Could it be a NASA curse? Now, it was the second time in a short period that NASA experienced very big technical problems. And then we come to January 27, not long ago, when this NASA plane crash landed in Ohio. Then I was writing like, okay, now it really can be a NASA curse, right? Because it had now happened three times. And if something should happen with the Artemis II launch February 8, then this starts to become very strange. Perhaps we have come to the same point in evolution, where other life forms in the universe died previous civilizations that never managed to become a multiplanetary species, the point they also failed. Perhaps they encountered the same so-called curse, where nature or the machine is now on its way to stop us in the same way.

SPEAKER_01

So, this also has a biological aspect to it. It is not only about the NASA curse, but it is somewhat fascinating, particularly in relation to Fermi's paradox. And I also suspect that even people at NASA and SpaceX agree, even though they have their own interests in their projects, that what we are witnessing could be a crucial point in time for life on Earth. That the solution to Fermi's paradox was always the zoo hypothesis, that it is actually Fermi life forms that are approaching us after we triggered the zero-risk detection mechanism in nature.

SPEAKER_04

So good.

SPEAKER_01

And now I was able to test the new microphone, the software, and how the studio should be set up in the future episodes. So if something happens with the Artemis program, then I think it could be a big signal that things are happening. And if it really becomes serious, if it escalates so much that it's not just me noticing it, but everyone starts asking, what is happening now? Let's say, for example, that SpaceX's satellites start to fail and crash into each other, or perhaps the space station explodes. If such a scenario were to unfold during 2026 or 2027, then this broadcast would become important. Remember that these life forms don't experience time the way we do, so it's not necessarily something that has to happen immediately. I assume it might happen gradually. If further into 2026 such things begin to occur, then this broadcast becomes important because it would mean that my theory may have been correct all along. But if nothing like that happens and it just fizzes out, then it's fine. It's not that dangerous. As long as the truth comes out, then it's okay. And for the prediction in Mini Article 2, I predict that the next signaling interstellar object will come between 2029 and 2032. I have also predicted that it will most likely come from black holes, preferably from Sagittarius. It will arrive within the time window between 2029 and 2032, and it will behave strangely like 3i slash Atlas, but even more so. The reason I make that prediction is that it's really the only way I can prove my theory. If I always come afterward and say I said so, then no one cares. But now I am presenting it and documenting it in advance. If it then happens, the scientific community might finally start to read my articles, because then I may actually have figured out some of what is really going on.

SPEAKER_02

Yes, uh, so when I'm first here and sitting here, now I'm kind of finished with the pilot episode. This was the buildup to it with NASA and the Artemis program, and why I now want to cover this live. Because I want to document it. I notice that when I discuss these things, and skeptics come on when we discuss them on Reddit, and so on, then the skeptics say things like, no, no, this is just nonsense. You don't understand anything, you don't know what you're talking about, it's just nonsense. You're making it up. Take your medicine, go to a psychologist, and things like that. Therefore, I understand that the only way to respond to those arguments is to document it. I have become very focused on that now I will actually document it. If I sit here live and document it, it will become very difficult for people to come afterward and say that it is nonsense. As I also say in some of my posts on X, I think there is a lot of politics behind this. If people don't want something to be correct, then they simply don't want it to be correct. They are not interested in it being correct, and they will push it away with everything they have. Very often these skeptics are probably highly educated people, perhaps working at universities or similar institutions. If they don't want you to be right, they will use all their intellectual capacity to undermine you. I have two master's degrees and things like that, but I don't have a professor title. I have never had a formal research title. The only research position I have had was in head biotech. So documenting this through live broadcasts is very important for me simply to document it, because then it becomes much more difficult to undermine the theory. Then we have it on film, you could say, directly in a live broadcast.

SPEAKER_01

So the only way to do it as I see it is to document things as much as I can, because the critics don't seem to care anyway. As long as they find something to undermine you, they will use it. But it is hard to argue against a live stream.

SPEAKER_02

At last, there is also another thing I want to. Say about the Fermi life forms that I have gradually become aware of. In my articles, I have sometimes referenced the Bible, not much, maybe only a handful of times over the last 20 years, but these themes almost resemble biblical scenarios. This idea of paradise and more advanced life forms approaching Earth has a certain biblical dimension. Sometimes I have referred to a few Bible verses. What was interesting with the Paradise Women idea and how this paradise unfolded is that the woman baby concept helped support this narrative if these Fermi life forms are connected to that idea of paradise women. Not that I was physically sent through and ended up on the other side of an event horizon, but perhaps they simply showed it to me through some form of control over the quantum world. For example, what is interesting is that in the Bible, in Isaiah 66, paradise is described almost as God becoming like a woman. Paradise is experienced as a woman who takes care of her child. So I use that reference to suggest that there is a female power in paradise. In Islam, there is also something similar. It is not in the Quran itself, but in a hadith. It talks about 67 or 72 women, often referred to as virgins. I'm not sure whether the number is 67 or 72, but roughly around 70. And interestingly, when I think about the paradise women I described, the number felt similar to many to count precisely, but it could easily have been something like that. Perhaps it was exactly the same number as described in Islam, for example. What I find interesting about these religious references is that according to the theory, all religions on Earth should contain some element of truth. The fact that humans have concepts of paradise is probably not random. It could also be something built into the paradise machine. Life that grows up within the machine will start thinking about these concepts, paradise, higher states, and so on. So the fact that religions contain these ideas may also be intentional. In that sense, religions themselves might also be something the paradise machine wants to exist. I'm not saying I believe in all of them in a traditional sense. My argument is that all religions should, according to the theory, contain at least small pieces of truth. As most of them have been developed in natural chaos, in which love and intelligence should be the product what the paradise machine wants, you could say. That's why it is interesting that both Christianity and also Islam contain clear references to women in paradise. I don't know as much about other religions, but those two I know best. And both contain very clear references that reflect aspects of the paradise machine model. So I think I have now covered the most important points. It has been more than an hour, and I must say I'm tired. I get tired myself sometimes of these topics, but I see this as important topics, so it's good to have it recorded. So I will stop the recording now. This was not live, but I have tested the equipment, the microphone, and so on.